You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaching transposon classification as a means to crowd source the curation of repeat annotation – a tardigrade perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mobile DNA, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13100-024-00319-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentina Peona, Jacopo Martelossi, Dareen Almojil, Julia Bocharkina, Ioana Brännström, Max Brown, Alice Cang, Tomàs Carrasco-Valenzuela, Jon DeVries, Meredith Doellman, Daniel Elsner, Pamela Espíndola-Hernández, Guillermo Friis Montoya, Bence Gaspar, Danijela Zagorski, Paweł Hałakuc, Beti Ivanovska, Christopher Laumer, Robert Lehmann, Ljudevit Luka Boštjančić, Rahia Mashoodh, Sofia Mazzoleni, Alice Mouton, Maria Anna Nilsson, Yifan Pei, Giacomo Potente, Panagiotis Provataris, José Ramón Pardos-Blas, Ravindra Raut, Tomasa Sbaffi, Florian Schwarz, Jessica Stapley, Lewis Stevens, Nusrat Sultana, Radka Symonova, Mohadeseh S. Tahami, Alice Urzì, Heidi Yang, Abdullah Yusuf, Carlo Pecoraro, Alexander Suh |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,757,883
of 32,472,916 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#94
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,152
of 358,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,472,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them