| Title |
A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004420050381 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter S. Curtis, Xianzhong Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 548 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 504 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 121 | 22% |
| Researcher | 111 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 106 | 19% |
| Unknown | 73 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 246 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 121 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 41 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 5% |
| Unknown | 93 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,534
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#452
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,925
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.