↓ Skip to main content

New Genetic Discoveries and Primary Immune Deficiencies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
New Genetic Discoveries and Primary Immune Deficiencies
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12016-013-8380-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivian Hernandez-Trujillo

Abstract

The field of immunology has undergone recent discoveries of genetic causes for many primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). The ever-expanding knowledge has led to increased understanding behind the pathophysiology of these diseases. Since these diseases are rare, the patients are frequently misdiagnosed early in the presentation of their illnesses. The identification of new genes has increased our opportunities for recognizing and making the diagnosis in patients with PIDD before they succumb to infections that may result secondary to their PIDD. Some mutations lead to a variety of presentations of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID). The myriad and ever-growing genetic mutations which lead to SCID phenotypes have been identified in recent years. Other mutations associated with some genetic syndromes have associated immunodeficiency and are important for making the diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency in patients with some syndromes, who may otherwise be missed within the larger context of their syndromes. A variety of mutations also lead to increased susceptibility to infections due to particular organisms. These patterns of infections due to specific organisms are important keys in properly identifying the part of the immune system which is affected in these patients. This review will discuss recent genetic discoveries that enhance our understanding of these complex diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Other 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,810,041
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#566
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,177
of 175,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.