↓ Skip to main content

X-Ray Diffraction from Isolated and Strongly Aligned Gas-Phase Molecules with a Free-Electron Laser

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
X-Ray Diffraction from Isolated and Strongly Aligned Gas-Phase Molecules with a Free-Electron Laser
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2014
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.112.083002
Authors

Jochen Küpper, Stephan Stern, Lotte Holmegaard, Frank Filsinger, Arnaud Rouzée, Artem Rudenko, Per Johnsson, Andrew V. Martin, Marcus Adolph, Andrew Aquila, Saša Bajt, Anton Barty, Christoph Bostedt, John Bozek, Carl Caleman, Ryan Coffee, Nicola Coppola, Tjark Delmas, Sascha Epp, Benjamin Erk, Lutz Foucar, Tais Gorkhover, Lars Gumprecht, Andreas Hartmann, Robert Hartmann, Günter Hauser, Peter Holl, Andre Hömke, Nils Kimmel, Faton Krasniqi, Kai-Uwe Kühnel, Jochen Maurer, Marc Messerschmidt, Robert Moshammer, Christian Reich, Benedikt Rudek, Robin Santra, Ilme Schlichting, Carlo Schmidt, Sebastian Schorb, Joachim Schulz, Heike Soltau, John C. H. Spence, Dmitri Starodub, Lothar Strüder, Jan Thøgersen, Marc J. J. Vrakking, Georg Weidenspointner, Thomas A. White, Cornelia Wunderer, Gerard Meijer, Joachim Ullrich, Henrik Stapelfeldt, Daniel Rolles, Henry N. Chapman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 201 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Student > Master 18 9%
Professor 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 117 55%
Chemistry 36 17%
Engineering 7 3%
Materials Science 6 3%
Chemical Engineering 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#476,357
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#1,261
of 36,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,453
of 223,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#14
of 787 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 787 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.