| Title |
Tipping Points in the Arctic: Eyeballing or Statistical Significance?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-011-0223-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Carstensen, Agata Weydmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,706
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,331
of 252,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.