↓ Skip to main content

Going, Going, Gone! A Swift Tour of Auction Theory and its Applications

Overview of attention for article published in De Economist, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Going, Going, Gone! A Swift Tour of Auction Theory and its Applications
Published in
De Economist, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10645-006-9002-5
Authors

Emiel Maasland, Sander Onderstal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 26%
Engineering 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2007.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from De Economist
#104
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,446
of 65,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from De Economist
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them