↓ Skip to main content

Recolonization pattern of the polychaete Lanice conchilega on an intertidal sand flat following the severe winter of 1995/96

Overview of attention for article published in Helgoland Marine Research, August 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Recolonization pattern of the polychaete Lanice conchilega on an intertidal sand flat following the severe winter of 1995/96
Published in
Helgoland Marine Research, August 2001
DOI 10.1007/s101520100081
Authors

Matthias Strasser, Ursula Pieloth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 54%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2007.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Helgoland Marine Research
#85
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,745
of 38,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Helgoland Marine Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.