↓ Skip to main content

The influence of mussel beds on nutrients in the Western Wadden Sea and Eastern Scheldt estuaries

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, June 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The influence of mussel beds on nutrients in the Western Wadden Sea and Eastern Scheldt estuaries
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, June 1991
DOI 10.2307/1351686
Authors

Richard Dame, Norbert Dankers, Theo Prins, Henk Jongsma, Aad Smaal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 45%
Environmental Science 36 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 13 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#498
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,942
of 16,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.