You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidemiological, Virological and Serological Studies on the Poliomyelitis Epidemic in Sapporo City in Summer 1956
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene, January 1958
|
| DOI | 10.1265/jjh.13.398 |
| Authors |
Masatsugu Kanamitsu, Tadao Kawarabayashi, Kazuo Kita, Tamotsu Taira, Shingo Yamaguchi, Nobuo Hashimoto, Tokuo Noriteki, Susumu Watanabe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,399,661
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#32
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223
of 6,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon eiseigaku zasshi Japanese journal of hygiene
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them