↓ Skip to main content

Treatment Adherence Intervention Studies in Dermatology and Guidance on How to Support Adherence

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Treatment Adherence Intervention Studies in Dermatology and Guidance on How to Support Adherence
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40257-017-0253-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R. Feldman, Bernard Vrijens, Uwe Gieler, Stefano Piaserico, Lluís Puig, Peter van de Kerkhof

Abstract

Adequate adherence to prescribed treatment regimens can help to break the cycle of treatment failure, disease progression and subsequent treatment escalation. Unfortunately, adherence in the treatment of skin disorders such as acne, atopic dermatitis/eczema and psoriasis is often inadequate. A review of the literature identified a number of studies that tested an intervention to improve adherence in dermatology, including the following: electronic messages and/or reminders; more frequent or 'extra' clinic visits; audio-visual and internet-based interventions; and patient support programmes and/or self-management, educational training programmes. While there is no one solution or action for improving adherence, some interventions were more successful than others. We provide practical guidance on how to support adherence based on aspects of the successful interventions identified and on our collective opinion and clinical practice experience. Holding patients accountable, providing a caring and supportive environment, raising awareness of poor adherence and helping patients build a solid medication-taking habit can help to improve adherence so that patients can experience maximal treatment benefits and desired clinical outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 31 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Psychology 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 35 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,403,545
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#898
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#357,924
of 422,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.