| Title |
Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul E. Marik, Walter T. Linde-Zwirble, Edward A. Bittner, Jennifer Sahatjian, Douglas Hansell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 10% |
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Denmark | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 20% |
| Scientists | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Researcher | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 99 | 25% |
| Unknown | 88 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 225 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Unknown | 97 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#614,422
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#563
of 5,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,116
of 424,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.