↓ Skip to main content

Portuguese propolis disturbs glycolytic metabolism of human colorectal cancer in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Portuguese propolis disturbs glycolytic metabolism of human colorectal cancer in vitro
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel Valença, Filipa Morais-Santos, Vera Miranda-Gonçalves, Ana Margarida Ferreira, Cristina Almeida-Aguiar, Fátima Baltazar

Abstract

Propolis is a resin collected by bees from plant buds and exudates, which is further processed through the activity of bee enzymes. Propolis has been shown to possess many biological and pharmacological properties, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, immunostimulant and antitumor activities. Due to this bioactivity profile, this resin can become an alternative, economic and safe source of natural bioactive compounds.Antitumor action has been reported in vitro and in vivo for propolis extracts or its isolated compounds; however, Portuguese propolis has been little explored. The aim of this work was to evaluate the in vitro antitumor activity of Portuguese propolis on the human colon carcinoma cell line HCT-15, assessing the effect of different fractions (hexane, chloroform and ethanol residual) of a propolis ethanol extract on cell viability, proliferation, metabolism and death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 28%
Chemistry 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,154,684
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,441
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,610
of 196,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#26
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.