↓ Skip to main content

Towards Measuring Stress with Smartphones and Wearable Devices During Workday and Sleep

Overview of attention for article published in BioNanoScience, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 138)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Towards Measuring Stress with Smartphones and Wearable Devices During Workday and Sleep
Published in
BioNanoScience, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12668-013-0089-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amir Muaremi, Bert Arnrich, Gerhard Tröster

Abstract

Work should be a source of health, pride, and happiness, in the sense of enhancing motivation and strengthening personal development. Healthy and motivated employees perform better and remain loyal to the company for a longer time. But, when the person constantly experiences high workload over a longer period of time and is not able to recover, then work may lead to prolonged negative effects and might cause serious illnesses like chronic stress disease. In this work, we present a solution for assessing the stress experience of people, using features derived from smartphones and wearable chest belts. In particular, we use information from audio, physical activity, and communication data collected during workday and heart rate variability data collected at night during sleep to build multinomial logistic regression models. We evaluate our system in a real work environment and in daily-routine scenarios of 35 employees over a period of 4 months and apply the leave-one-day-out cross-validation method for each user individually to estimate the prediction accuracy. Using only smartphone features, we get an accuracy of 55 %, and using only heart rate variability features, we get an accuracy of 59 %. The combination of all features leads to a rate of 61 % for a three-stress level (low, moderate, and high perceived stress) classification problem.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 4 <1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 477 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 20%
Student > Master 81 16%
Researcher 67 13%
Student > Bachelor 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 64 13%
Unknown 108 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 125 25%
Engineering 94 19%
Psychology 37 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 6%
Social Sciences 17 3%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 125 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,645,768
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BioNanoScience
#11
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,154
of 209,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioNanoScience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them