↓ Skip to main content

m6A-dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal-to-zygotic transition

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
445 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
m6A-dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal-to-zygotic transition
Published in
Nature, February 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature21355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boxuan Simen Zhao, Xiao Wang, Alana V. Beadell, Zhike Lu, Hailing Shi, Adam Kuuspalu, Robert K. Ho, Chuan He

Abstract

The maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) is one of the most profound and tightly orchestrated processes during the early life of embryos, yet factors that shape the temporal pattern of vertebrate MZT are largely unknown. Here we show that over one-third of zebrafish maternal messenger RNAs (mRNAs) can be N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) modified, and the clearance of these maternal mRNAs is facilitated by an m(6)A-binding protein, Ythdf2. Removal of Ythdf2 in zebrafish embryos decelerates the decay of m(6)A-modified maternal mRNAs and impedes zygotic genome activation. These embryos fail to initiate timely MZT, undergo cell-cycle pause, and remain developmentally delayed throughout larval life. Our study reveals m(6)A-dependent RNA decay as a previously unidentified maternally driven mechanism that regulates maternal mRNA clearance during zebrafish MZT, highlighting the critical role of m(6)A mRNA methylation in transcriptome switching and animal development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 492 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 29%
Researcher 63 13%
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 50 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 8%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 90 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 204 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 3%
Chemistry 14 3%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Other 27 5%
Unknown 100 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#660,103
of 25,040,629 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#26,063
of 96,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,108
of 437,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#520
of 903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,040,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.