↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Possible Consequences of Zika Virus Infection in the Developing Nervous System

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Possible Consequences of Zika Virus Infection in the Developing Nervous System
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0442-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lais Takata Walter, Guilherme Shigueto Vilar Higa, Juliane Midori Ikebara, Danila Vedovello, Felipe Scassi Salvador, Silvia Honda Takada, Erika Reime Kinjo, Benjamin J. Whalley, Márcia Aparecida Sperança, Alexandre Hiroaki Kihara

Abstract

The Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak that occurred in the northeast of Brazil in 2015 led to alarming numbers of babies born with microcephaly in this region. Since then, several studies have evaluated the relationship between ZIKV infection and development of the malformation although the specific mechanistic interaction between ZIKV and human physiological processes that ultimately manifest as microcephaly remains debated. Importantly, most current studies did not consider the specificities of the biology and life cycle of ZIKV. As a consequence, specificities of the infection on the developing central nervous system (CNS) were frequently disregarded. In order to begin to address this important gap in our knowledge, we have collated and critically reviewed the existing evidence in this area to identify any emerging consensus on this topic and thereafter describe possible mechanisms by which ZIKV infection could interfere with specific processes of CNS development, such as neuronal proliferation, and the complex interactions of immature neurons with radial glial cells. With this, we were able to present the current knowledge on this important topic in the neurobiology field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,267,071
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#91
of 3,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,181
of 424,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#1
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.