↓ Skip to main content

Silent Aspiration: What Do We Know?

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
199 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Silent Aspiration: What Do We Know?
Published in
Dysphagia, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00455-005-0018-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Ramsey, David Smithard, Lalit Kalra

Abstract

Although clinically evident aspiration is common in subjects with dysphagia, a significant proportion may aspirate silently, i.e., without any outward signs of swallowing difficulty. This article reviews the literature on the prevalence, etiology, and prognostic significance of silent aspiration. An electronic database search was performed using silent aspiration, aspiration, dysphagia, and stroke as search terms, together with hand-searching of articles. Silent aspiration has been described in many conditions and subgroups of patients (including normal individuals), using a number of detection methods, making comparisons a challenge. The best data are for acute stroke, in which 2%-25% of patients may aspirate silently. Mechanisms associated with silent aspiration may include central or local weakness/incoordination of the pharyngeal musculature, reduced laryngopharyngeal sensation, impaired ability to produce a reflexive cough, and low substance P or dopamine levels. In terms of prognosis, silent aspiration has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in many but not all studies. However, some degree of silent aspiration at night may be normal in healthy individuals. The phenomenon of silent aspiration is poorly understood and further research is needed to improve methods of detection and thereby better define its prevalence and prognostic significance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Other 22 10%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 61 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Linguistics 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 68 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,564,360
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#179
of 1,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,105
of 155,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them