↓ Skip to main content

The Risk of Ischemic Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Events Associated with Oxycodone–Naloxone and Other Extended-Release High-Potency Opioids: A Nested Case–Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Risk of Ischemic Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Events Associated with Oxycodone–Naloxone and Other Extended-Release High-Potency Opioids: A Nested Case–Control Study
Published in
Drug Safety, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40264-017-0511-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrin Jobski, Bianca Kollhorst, Edeltraut Garbe, Tania Schink

Abstract

In Germany, an extended-release (ER) combination of the high-potency opioid (HPO) oxycodone and the antagonist naloxone was approved in 2006. In recent years, the cardio- and cerebrovascular safety of opioid antagonists and of opioids themselves has been discussed. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of major ischemic cardio- and cerebrovascular events in patients receiving ER oxycodone-naloxone compared with those receiving other ER HPOs. We used the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) to conduct a nested case-control study (2006-2011) within a cohort of ER HPO users. Cases were defined as patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemic stroke (IS). For each case, up to ten controls were selected by risk-set sampling. Using conditional logistic regression, confounder-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for the risk of MI/IS associated with (1) current HPO treatment, (2) recent discontinuation, or (3) recent switch of HPO therapy compared with past treatment. In 309,936 ER HPO users, 12,384 MI/IS events were detected, resulting in a crude incidence rate of 19.48 (95% CI 19.14-19.82) per 1000 person years. A small but significantly elevated aOR was found for morphine (1.12; 95% CI 1.04-1.22) but not for oxycodone-naloxone. Recent discontinuation and recent switch of any ER HPO also had a significant impact on the outcome (aOR 1.12; 95% CI 1.04-1.21 and 1.25; 95% CI 1.03-1.52, respectively). Our study does not indicate an association between oxycodone-naloxone and ischemic cardio- or cerebrovascular events. However, our findings do suggest that every change in ER HPO therapy should be conducted with caution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#16,294,872
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#1,476
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,811
of 434,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.