↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Socioeconomic Status Is Not Related with Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry: Evidence from Latin-American Populations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Socioeconomic Status Is Not Related with Facial Fluctuating Asymmetry: Evidence from Latin-American Populations
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0172418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirsha Quinto-Sánchez, Celia Cintas, Caio Cesar Silva de Cerqueira, Virginia Ramallo, Victor Acuña-Alonzo, Kaustubh Adhikari, Lucía Castillo, Jorge Gomez-Valdés, Paola Everardo, Francisco De Avila, Tábita Hünemeier, Claudia Jaramillo, Williams Arias, Macarena Fuentes, Carla Gallo, Giovani Poletti, Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, Maria Cátira Bortolini, Samuel Canizales-Quinteros, Francisco Rothhammer, Gabriel Bedoya, Javier Rosique, Andrés Ruiz-Linares, Rolando González-José

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169287.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#18,531,724
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#155,865
of 195,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,223
of 426,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,388
of 4,430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.