↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Evaluation of Pleiotropy Identifies 6 Further Loci Associated With Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
57 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Evaluation of Pleiotropy Identifies 6 Further Loci Associated With Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
JACC, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R. Webb, Jeanette Erdmann, Kathleen E. Stirrups, Nathan O. Stitziel, Nicholas G.D. Masca, Henning Jansen, Stavroula Kanoni, Christopher P. Nelson, Paola G. Ferrario, Inke R. König, John D. Eicher, Andrew D. Johnson, Stephen E. Hamby, Christer Betsholtz, Arno Ruusalepp, Oscar Franzén, Eric E. Schadt, Johan L.M. Björkegren, Peter E. Weeke, Paul L. Auer, Ursula M. Schick, Yingchang Lu, He Zhang, Marie-Pierre Dube, Anuj Goel, Martin Farrall, Gina M. Peloso, Hong-Hee Won, Ron Do, Erik van Iperen, Jochen Kruppa, Anubha Mahajan, Robert A. Scott, Christina Willenborg, Peter S. Braund, Julian C. van Capelleveen, Alex S.F. Doney, Louise A. Donnelly, Rosanna Asselta, Pier A. Merlini, Stefano Duga, Nicola Marziliano, Josh C. Denny, Christian Shaffer, Nour Eddine El-Mokhtari, Andre Franke, Stefanie Heilmann, Christian Hengstenberg, Per Hoffmann, Oddgeir L. Holmen, Kristian Hveem, Jan-Håkan Jansson, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Thorsten Kessler, Jennifer Kriebel, Karl L. Laugwitz, Eirini Marouli, Nicola Martinelli, Mark I. McCarthy, Natalie R. Van Zuydam, Christa Meisinger, Tõnu Esko, Evelin Mihailov, Stefan A. Escher, Maris Alver, Susanne Moebus, Andrew D. Morris, Jarma Virtamo, Majid Nikpay, Oliviero Olivieri, Sylvie Provost, Alaa AlQarawi, Neil R. Robertson, Karen O. Akinsansya, Dermot F. Reilly, Thomas F. Vogt, Wu Yin, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Charles Kooperberg, Rebecca D. Jackson, Eli Stahl, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Konstantin Strauch, Tibor V. Varga, Melanie Waldenberger, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Lingyao Zeng, Rajiv Chowdhury, Veikko Salomaa, Ian Ford, J. Wouter Jukema, Philippe Amouyel, Jukka Kontto, MORGAM Investigators, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Jean Ferrières, Danish Saleheen, Naveed Sattar, Praveen Surendran, Aline Wagner, Robin Young, Joanna M.M. Howson, Adam S. Butterworth, John Danesh, Diego Ardissino, Erwin P. Bottinger, Raimund Erbel, Paul W. Franks, Domenico Girelli, Alistair S. Hall, G. Kees Hovingh, Adnan Kastrati, Wolfgang Lieb, Thomas Meitinger, William E. Kraus, Svati H. Shah, Ruth McPherson, Marju Orho-Melander, Olle Melander, Andres Metspalu, Colin N.A. Palmer, Annette Peters, Daniel J. Rader, Muredach P. Reilly, Ruth J.F. Loos, Alex P. Reiner, Dan M. Roden, Jean-Claude Tardif, John R. Thompson, Nicholas J. Wareham, Hugh Watkins, Cristen J. Willer, Nilesh J. Samani, Heribert Schunkert, Panos Deloukas, Sekar Kathiresan, Myocardial Infarction Genetics and CARDIoGRAM Exome Consortia Investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Master 17 7%
Professor 16 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 80 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 90 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#609,721
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,550
of 16,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,121
of 427,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#56
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.