↓ Skip to main content

The phylogeography debate and the epistemology of model-based evolutionary biology

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
The phylogeography debate and the epistemology of model-based evolutionary biology
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10539-013-9391-1
Authors

Alfonso Arroyo-Santos, Mark E. Olson, Francisco Vergara-Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 6 10%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Philosophy 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,755,656
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#485
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,404
of 193,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.