↓ Skip to main content

Muscle strength in breast cancer patients receiving different treatment regimes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
661 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Muscle strength in breast cancer patients receiving different treatment regimes
Published in
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/jcsm.12165
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Muscle dysfunction and sarcopenia have been associated with poor performance status, an increased mortality risk, and greater side effects in oncologic patients. However, little is known about how performance is affected by cancer therapy. We investigated muscle strength in breast cancer patients in different adjuvant treatment settings and also compared it with data from healthy individuals. Breast cancer patients (N = 255) from two randomized controlled exercise trials, staged 0-III and aged 54.4 ± 9.4 years, were categorized into four groups according to their treatment status. In a cross-sectional design, muscle function was assessed bilaterally by isokinetic dynamometry (0°, 60°, 180°/s) as maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and maximal isokinetic peak torque (MIPT) in shoulder rotators and knee flexors and extensors. Additionally, muscular fatigue index (FI%) and shoulder flexibility were evaluated. Healthy women (N = 26), aged 53.3 ± 9.8 years, were tested using the same method. Analysis of covariance was used to estimate the impact of different cancer treatments on skeletal muscle function with adjustment for various clinical and socio-demographic factors. Consistently, lower muscle strength was measured in shoulder and knee strength in patients after chemotherapy. On average, patients had up to 25% lower strength in lower extremities and 12-16% in upper extremities in MVIC and MIPT during cancer treatment compared with healthy women. No substantial difference between patient groups in shoulder strength, but significantly lower shoulder flexibility in patients with radical mastectomy was measured. Chemotherapy-treated patients had consistently higher FI%. No serious adverse events were reported. Breast cancer patients showed markedly impaired muscle strength and joint dysfunctions before and after anticancer treatment. The significant differences between patients and healthy individuals underline the need of exercise therapy as early as possible in order to prevent or counteract the loss of muscle function after curative surgery as well as the consequences of neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 660 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 11%
Student > Bachelor 72 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 7%
Student > Postgraduate 34 5%
Researcher 31 5%
Other 93 14%
Unknown 310 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 93 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 92 14%
Sports and Recreations 69 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 2%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 50 8%
Unknown 335 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,395
of 29,353,513 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#512
of 1,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,565
of 421,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,353,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.