↓ Skip to main content

The effects of rules on local political decision-making processes: How can rules facilitate participation?

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
The effects of rules on local political decision-making processes: How can rules facilitate participation?
Published in
Policy Sciences, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11077-017-9284-2
Authors

Insa Theesfeld, Tom Dufhues, Gertrud Buchenrieder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Lecturer 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,819,139
of 23,752,589 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#145
of 448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,860
of 425,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,752,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.