↓ Skip to main content

A genome-wide supported variant in CACNA1C influences hippocampal activation during episodic memory encoding and retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A genome-wide supported variant in CACNA1C influences hippocampal activation during episodic memory encoding and retrieval
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00406-013-0428-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Krug, Stephanie H. Witt, Heidelore Backes, Bruno Dietsche, Vanessa Nieratschker, N. Jon Shah, Markus M. Nöthen, Marcella Rietschel, Tilo Kircher

Abstract

The alpha 1C subunit of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (CACNA1C) gene is one of the best replicated susceptibility loci for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and major depression. It is involved in learning, memory and brain plasticity. Genetic studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reported evidence of association with the CACNA1C single nucleotide polymorphism rs1006737 with functional correlates of episodic memory encoding and retrieval, especially activations in the hippocampus. These results, however, are inconsistent with regard to the magnitude and directionality of effect. In the present study, brain activation was measured with fMRI during an episodic memory encoding and retrieval task using neutral faces in two independent samples of 94 and 111 healthy subjects, respectively. Within whole brain analyses, a main effect of genotype emerged mainly in the right hippocampus during encoding as well as retrieval within the first sample: Carriers of the minor allele (A) exhibited lower activations compared to G/G allele carriers. This effect could be replicated within the second sample, however, only for the retrieval condition. The results strengthen findings that rs1006737 is associated with neural systems related to memory processes in hippocampal regions which are detectable in healthy subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 14%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 27%
Neuroscience 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#939
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,419
of 173,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.