You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic behaviour of the East Antarctic ice sheet during Pliocene warmth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo1889 |
| Authors |
Carys P. Cook, Tina van de Flierdt, Trevor Williams, Sidney R. Hemming, Masao Iwai, Munemasa Kobayashi, Francisco J. Jimenez-Espejo, Carlota Escutia, Jhon Jairo González, Boo-Keun Khim, Robert M. McKay, Sandra Passchier, Steven M. Bohaty, Christina R. Riesselman, Lisa Tauxe, Saiko Sugisaki, Alberto Lopez Galindo, Molly O. Patterson, Francesca Sangiorgi, Elizabeth L. Pierce, Henk Brinkhuis, Adam Klaus, Annick Fehr, James A. P. Bendle, Peter K. Bijl, Stephanie A. Carr, Robert B. Dunbar, José Abel Flores, Travis G. Hayden, Kota Katsuki, Gee Soo Kong, Mutsumi Nakai, Matthew P. Olney, Stephen F. Pekar, Jörg Pross, Ursula Röhl, Toyosaburo Sakai, Prakash K. Shrivastava, Catherine E. Stickley, Shouting Tuo, Kevin Welsh, Masako Yamane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Norway | 5 | 9% |
| Sweden | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 331 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 26% |
| Researcher | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Professor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 209 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 83 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 307. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#113,298
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#264
of 3,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#685
of 209,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 106.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.