↓ Skip to main content

Is it Useful to Have a Clear-cut Definition of Life? On the Use of Fuzzy Logic in Prebiotic Chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Is it Useful to Have a Clear-cut Definition of Life? On the Use of Fuzzy Logic in Prebiotic Chemistry
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11084-010-9192-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilles Bruylants, Kristin Bartik, Jacques Reisse

Abstract

Many scientists, including one of the authors of the present paper, have devoted time to try to find a definition for life (Bersini and Reisse 2007). It is clear that a consensus will never be reached but, more importantly, it seems that the issue itself could be without major interest. It is indeed impossible to define a "natural" frontier between non-living and living systems and therefore also impossible to define dichotomic criteria which could be used in order to classify systems in one of these two classes (living or non-living). Fuzzy logic provides a natural way to deal with problems where class membership lacks sharply defined criteria. It also offers the possibility to avoid losing time with unnecessary controversies such as deciding whether a virus is, or is not, a living system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 53 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Researcher 12 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,549,838
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#123
of 476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,663
of 96,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.