↓ Skip to main content

Extent and ecological consequences of hunting in Central African rainforests in the twenty-first century

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extent and ecological consequences of hunting in Central African rainforests in the twenty-first century
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2013
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0303
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. A. Abernethy, L. Coad, G. Taylor, M. E. Lee, F. Maisels

Abstract

Humans have hunted wildlife in Central Africa for millennia. Today, however, many species are being rapidly extirpated and sanctuaries for wildlife are dwindling. Almost all Central Africa's forests are now accessible to hunters. Drastic declines of large mammals have been caused in the past 20 years by the commercial trade for meat or ivory. We review a growing body of empirical data which shows that trophic webs are significantly disrupted in the region, with knock-on effects for other ecological functions, including seed dispersal and forest regeneration. Plausible scenarios for land-use change indicate that increasing extraction pressure on Central African forests is likely to usher in new worker populations and to intensify the hunting impacts and trophic cascade disruption already in progress, unless serious efforts are made for hunting regulation. The profound ecological changes initiated by hunting will not mitigate and may even exacerbate the predicted effects of climate change for the region. We hypothesize that, in the near future, the trophic changes brought about by hunting will have a larger and more rapid impact on Central African rainforest structure and function than the direct impacts of climate change on the vegetation. Immediate hunting regulation is vital for the survival of the Central African rainforest ecosystem.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 413 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 81 19%
Student > Master 79 18%
Researcher 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 83 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 33%
Environmental Science 127 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 90 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#963,111
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#854
of 7,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,033
of 209,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#15
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.