↓ Skip to main content

Determining informative priors for cognitive models

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Determining informative priors for cognitive models
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1238-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Lee, Wolf Vanpaemel

Abstract

The development of cognitive models involves the creative scientific formalization of assumptions, based on theory, observation, and other relevant information. In the Bayesian approach to implementing, testing, and using cognitive models, assumptions can influence both the likelihood function of the model, usually corresponding to assumptions about psychological processes, and the prior distribution over model parameters, usually corresponding to assumptions about the psychological variables that influence those processes. The specification of the prior is unique to the Bayesian context, but often raises concerns that lead to the use of vague or non-informative priors in cognitive modeling. Sometimes the concerns stem from philosophical objections, but more often practical difficulties with how priors should be determined are the stumbling block. We survey several sources of information that can help to specify priors for cognitive models, discuss some of the methods by which this information can be formalized in a prior distribution, and identify a number of benefits of including informative priors in cognitive modeling. Our discussion is based on three illustrative cognitive models, involving memory retention, categorization, and decision making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 25%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 6%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 121 47%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 62 24%