↓ Skip to main content

Accurate Automated Detection of Autism Related Corpus Callosum Abnormalities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Accurate Automated Detection of Autism Related Corpus Callosum Abnormalities
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10916-010-9510-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayman El-Baz, Ahmed Elnakib, Manuel F. Casanova, Georgy Gimel’farb, Andrew E. Switala, Desha Jordan, Sabrina Rainey

Abstract

The importance of accurate early diagnostics of autism that severely affects personal behavior and communication skills cannot be overstated. Neuropathological studies have revealed an abnormal anatomy of the Corpus Callosum (CC) in autistic brains. We propose a new approach to quantitative analysis of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the brain that ensures a more accurate quantification of anatomical differences between the CC of autistic and normal subjects. It consists of three main processing steps: (i) segmenting the CC from a given 3D MRI using the learned CC shape and visual appearance; (ii) extracting a centerline of the CC; and (iii) cylindrical mapping of the CC surface for its comparative analysis. Our experiments revealed significant differences (at the 95% confidence level) between 17 normal and 17 autistic subjects in four anatomical divisions, i.e. splenium, rostrum, genu and body of their CCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 15%
Engineering 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Psychology 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#804
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,683
of 95,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.