Title |
d-mannose powder for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Urology, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00345-013-1091-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bojana Kranjčec, Dino Papeš, Silvio Altarac |
Abstract |
To test whether D-mannose powder is effective for recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
France | 4 | 8% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 40 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 396 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 57 | 14% |
Researcher | 44 | 11% |
Other | 39 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
Other | 72 | 18% |
Unknown | 95 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 33% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
Other | 53 | 13% |
Unknown | 108 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 161. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#248,722
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#12
of 2,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,553
of 197,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.