| Title |
d-mannose powder for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-013-1091-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bojana Kranjčec, Dino Papeš, Silvio Altarac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| France | 4 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 399 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 14% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 72 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 132 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 34 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#234,213
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#11
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,476
of 205,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.