You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Study of Breakfast Eating and Incident Coronary Heart Disease in a Cohort of Male US Health Professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.113.001474 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah E. Cahill, Stephanie E. Chiuve, Rania A. Mekary, Majken K. Jensen, Alan J. Flint, Frank B. Hu, Eric B. Rimm |
| Abstract |
Among adults, skipping meals is associated with excess body weight, hypertension, insulin resistance, and elevated fasting lipid concentrations. However, it remains unknown whether specific eating habits regardless of dietary composition influence coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. The objective of this study was to prospectively examine eating habits and risk of CHD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 742 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 90 | 12% |
| Indonesia | 81 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 5% |
| Thailand | 29 | 4% |
| Spain | 18 | 2% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| Australia | 8 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 50 | 7% |
| Unknown | 405 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 602 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 91 | 12% |
| Scientists | 39 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 330 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 14% |
| Researcher | 47 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 20% |
| Unknown | 75 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 89 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,167
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#32
of 21,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20
of 210,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#1
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.