↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between ß-Glucocerebrosidase Mutations and Parkinsonism

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Association Between ß-Glucocerebrosidase Mutations and Parkinsonism
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11910-013-0368-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Swan, Rachel Saunders-Pullman

Abstract

Mutations in the ß-glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA), which encodes the lysosomal enzyme ß-glucocerebrosidase, have traditionally been implicated in Gaucher disease, an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder. Yet the past two decades have yielded an explosion of epidemiological and basic-science evidence linking mutations in GBA with the development of Parkinson disease (PD) as well. Although the specific contribution of mutant GBA to the pathogenesis of parkinsonism remains unknown, evidence suggests that both loss of function and toxic gain of function by abnormal ß-glucocerebrosidase may be important, and implicates a close relationship between ß-glucocerebrosidase and α-synuclein. Furthermore, multiple lines of evidence suggest that although GBA-associated PD closely mimics idiopathic PD (IPD), it may present at a younger age, and is more frequently complicated by cognitive dysfunction. Understanding the clinical association between GBA and PD, and the relationship between ß-glucocerebrosidase and α-synuclein, may enhance understanding of the pathogenesis of IPD, improve prognostication and treatment of GBA carriers with parkinsonism, and furthermore inform therapies for IPD not due to GBA mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,139,508
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#303
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,662
of 201,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them