↓ Skip to main content

New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11255-017-1541-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asim Afaq, Deepak Batura, Jamshed Bomanji

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is a relatively new method of imaging prostate cancer that increases diagnostic accuracy in detecting and guiding management in various stages of the disease pathway. Gallium-68-labelled PSMA PET has increased the sensitivity of detection of disease recurrence at low PSA levels, thus allowing an optimal window for salvage treatment. Apart from its use in disease recurrence, PSMA PET has the potential for increasing sensitivity and specificity for primary tumour localisation and in detecting lymph node disease, leading to a more accurate initial staging of the condition. In advanced disease, the use of PSMA PET may be able to assess response to treatment and also guide treatment with radionuclide therapy. Newer ligands under development might provide avenues for theranostic or personalised therapy applications with early data showing high PSA response rates. The rate of translation of PSMA PET into clinical practice has been remarkable. The use of this modality is likely to increase with future efforts to modify the radiotracer including (18)F labelling to improve availability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Unspecified 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,049,212
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#331
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,664
of 433,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.