| Title |
Impacts of afforestation on groundwater resources and quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrogeology Journal, August 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s100400100148 |
| Authors |
Alistair Allen, Deborah Chapman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 35 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,107,433
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#15
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#736
of 38,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them