↓ Skip to main content

Design-driven, multi-use research agendas to enable applied synthetic biology for global health

Overview of attention for article published in Systems and Synthetic Biology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Design-driven, multi-use research agendas to enable applied synthetic biology for global health
Published in
Systems and Synthetic Biology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11693-013-9118-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Carothers

Abstract

Many of the synthetic biological devices, pathways and systems that can be engineered are multi-use, in the sense that they could be used both for commercially-important applications and to help meet global health needs. The on-going development of models and simulation tools for assembling component parts into functionally-complex devices and systems will enable successful engineering with much less trial-and-error experimentation and laboratory infrastructure. As illustrations, I draw upon recent examples from my own work and the broader Keasling research group at the University of California Berkeley and the Joint BioEnergy Institute, of which I was formerly a part. By combining multi-use synthetic biology research agendas with advanced computer-aided design tool creation, it may be possible to more rapidly engineer safe and effective synthetic biology technologies that help address a wide range of global health problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Engineering 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,626,767
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#27
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,278
of 197,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systems and Synthetic Biology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.