| Title |
Effect of a condolence letter on grief symptoms among relatives of patients who died in the ICU: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4669-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy Kentish-Barnes, Sylvie Chevret, Benoît Champigneulle, Marina Thirion, Virginie Souppart, Marion Gilbert, Olivier Lesieur, Anne Renault, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Laurent Argaud, Marion Venot, Alexandre Demoule, Olivier Guisset, Isabelle Vinatier, Gilles Troché, Julien Massot, Samir Jaber, Caroline Bornstain, Véronique Gaday, René Robert, Jean-Philippe Rigaud, Raphaël Cinotti, Mélanie Adda, François Thomas, Laure Calvet, Marion Galon, Zoé Cohen-Solal, Alain Cariou, Elie Azoulay, Famirea Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 25% |
| United States | 16 | 21% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 28% |
| Scientists | 15 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 21% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 16% |
| Psychology | 27 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 76 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#823,560
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#768
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,444
of 440,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.