↓ Skip to main content

Year-End Clinic Handoffs: A National Survey of Academic Internal Medicine Programs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Year-End Clinic Handoffs: A National Survey of Academic Internal Medicine Programs
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4005-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica Phillips, Christina Harris, Wei Wei Lee, Amber T. Pincavage, Karin Ouchida, Rachel K. Miller, Saima Chaudhry, Vineet M. Arora

Abstract

While there has been increasing emphasis and innovation nationwide in training residents in inpatient handoffs, very little is known about the practice and preparation for year-end clinic handoffs of residency outpatient continuity practices. Thus, the latter remains an identified, yet nationally unaddressed, patient safety concern. The 2014 annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (APDIM) survey included seven items for assessing the current year-end clinic handoff practices of internal medicine residency programs throughout the country. Nationwide survey. All internal medicine program directors registered with APDIM. Descriptive statistics of programs and tools used to formulate a year-end handoff in the ambulatory setting, methods for evaluating the process, patient safety and quality measures incorporated within the process, and barriers to conducting year-end handoffs. Of the 361 APDIM member programs, 214 (59%) completed the Transitions of Care Year-End Clinic Handoffs section of the survey. Only 34% of respondent programs reported having a year-end ambulatory handoff system, and 4% reported assessing residents for competency in this area. The top three barriers to developing a year-end handoff system were insufficient overlap between graduating and incoming residents, inability to schedule patients with new residents in advance, and time constraints for residents, attendings, and support staff. Most internal medicine programs do not have a year-end clinic handoff system in place. Greater attention to clinic handoffs and resident assessment of this care transition is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,107,209
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,205
of 8,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,298
of 436,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#44
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.