| Title |
Using historical accounts to set conservation baselines: the case of Lynx species in Spain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-013-0506-4 |
| Authors |
Miguel Clavero, Miguel Delibes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 30 | 41% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 1% |
| Grenada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 91% |
| Scientists | 6 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#388,653
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#35
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,665
of 211,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.