You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional status, cachexia and survival in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Different assessment criteria for nutritional status provide unequal results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Nutrition, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lene Thoresen, Gunilla Frykholm, Stian Lydersen, Hege Ulveland, Vickie Baracos, Carla M.M. Prado, Laura Birdsell, Ursula Falkmer |
| Abstract |
Different nutrition assessment tools and definitions are proposed for cancer-associated malnutrition and wasting (cachexia). We studied the associations between these assessments and overall survival in stage IV colorectal carcinoma patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,810,902
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#847
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,827
of 181,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.