↓ Skip to main content

The anxiolytic effect of chronic inositol depends on the baseline level of anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
The anxiolytic effect of chronic inositol depends on the baseline level of anxiety
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission, February 2000
DOI 10.1007/s007020050020
Pubmed ID
Authors

O. Kofman, H. Einat, H. Cohen, H. Tenne, C. Shoshana

Abstract

Inositol, a precursor for membrane phosphoinositides involved in signal transduction, has been found to be clinically effective in a number of psychiatric disorders and to reverse behavioural effects of lithium. To gain insight into the mechanism of action of inositol, it is critical to establish its efficacy in animal models. Following the initial report by Cohen et al. (1997b) that inositol was anxiolytic in the elevated plus maze model of anxiety, the effect of chronic intraperitoneal and chronic dietary inositol administration in rats was tested in four experiments. There was a significant increase in closed arm and total arm entries following chronic injection of inositol, but no effect of inositol when it was given chronically in rat chow. Because the first 2 experiments suggested that the mode of drug administration affected the control levels of anxiety (open arm entries and time in open arms) in control groups, the effect of chronic dietary inositol was tested in rats that were exposed to a mild and a more severe form of stress. Chronic saline injections elevated anxiety in the plus maze, which was only marginally affected by chronic dietary inositol. Following 3 weeks administration of 5% dietary inositol rats were pre-exposed to a cat. There was a clear increase in number of entries into open arms, suggesting an anxiolytic effect of inositol.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Professor 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Psychology 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neural Transmission
#664
of 1,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,670
of 111,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neural Transmission
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.