↓ Skip to main content

Gender dependant snore sound based multi feature obstructive sleep apnea screening method

Overview of attention for article published in Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender dependant snore sound based multi feature obstructive sleep apnea screening method
Published in
Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, November 2012
DOI 10.1109/embc.2012.6347447
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. de Silva, U. Abeyratne, C. Hukins

Abstract

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a serious sleep disorder that occurs due to collapsing upper airways (UA). More than 80% of OSA sufferers remain undiagnosed and the situation demands simplified, convenient technology for community screening. Almost all OSA patients snore and snoring is the earliest nocturnal symptom of OSA. Snore signals (SS) are produced due to vibration of soft tissues in the narrowed parts of the UA. It is known that the UA properties are gender specific. In this paper, we work under the hypothesis that gender specific analysis of snore sounds should lead to a higher OSA detection performance. We propose a snore based multi-parametric OSA screening technique, which incorporates the gender differences in the algorithm. The multi feature vector was modeled using logistic regression based algorithms to classify subjects into OSA/non-OSA classes. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated by carrying out K-fold cross validation. This procedure was applied to male (n=51) and female (n=36) data sets recorded in a clinical sleep laboratory. Each data set consisted of sound recordings of 6-8 hr. duration. The performance of the method was evaluated against the standard laboratory method of diagnosis known as polysomongraphy. Our gender-specific technique resulted in a sensitivity of 93±9% with specificity 89±7% for females and sensitivity of 91±8% with specificity 89±12% for males. These results establish the possibility of developing cheap, convenient, non-contact and an unattended OSA screening technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 9 30%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Mathematics 3 10%
Computer Science 3 10%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
#2,857
of 4,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,800
of 196,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conference proceedings Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
#168
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.