↓ Skip to main content

Combination of high-dose melphalan and bortezomib as conditioning regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Combination of high-dose melphalan and bortezomib as conditioning regimen for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12185-013-1402-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshihiro Miyamoto, Goichi Yoshimoto, Tomohiko Kamimura, Tsuyoshi Muta, Shuichiro Takashima, Yoshikiyo Ito, Motoaki Shiratsuchi, Ilseung Choi, Koji Kato, Katsuto Takenaka, Hiromi Iwasaki, Yasushi Takamatsu, Takanori Teshima, Koichi Akashi

Abstract

Bortezomib and melphalan have synergistic effects against multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We conducted a pilot study on the combination of bortezomib and high-dose melphalan (Bor-HDM) as a conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 17 Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM, in comparison with a historical control of patients who received high-dose melphalan (HDM) only followed by ASCT. Nine patients received a single dose of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on day -1 in combination with melphalan 100 mg/m(2) on days -3 and -2 (Bor1-HDM), and eight received two doses of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days -4 and -1 (Bor2-HDM) in combination with HDM. Engraftment of autologous peripheral blood stem cells and regimen-related toxicities (RRT) were comparable among the HDM and Bor-HDM groups. Probability of upgrading from a less than very good partial response (VGPR) to VGPR after ASCT was approximately two times higher in the Bor-HDM group than in the HDM group. However, we observed no significant differences in engraftment, RRT, and response rates between the Bor1-HDM and Bor2-HDM groups. The present study showed that concurrent administration of at least two doses of bortezomib in combination with HDM can be safe in Japanese patients. Additional large prospective randomized trials are required to address the optimal dosages and schedules of bortezomib administration, as well as the efficacy of the Bor-HDM conditioning regimen for ASCT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Other 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,039,026
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#541
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,166
of 197,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.