↓ Skip to main content

The mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5 years follow-up of non-closure versus closure using the stapler technique

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
The mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5 years follow-up of non-closure versus closure using the stapler technique
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5415-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebrahim Aghajani, Bent J. Nergaard, Bjorn G. Leifson, Jan Hedenbro, Hjortur Gislason

Abstract

Internal hernia (IH) is a common complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Little large-volume data exist on how to handle the mesenteric defects during LRYGB. This study evaluated long-term follow-up (5.5 years) of 2443 patients with primary closure of the mesenteric defects with a stapling device at LRYGB, in comparison with a non-closed group from the same centre. All patients (N = 4013) undergoing LRYGB over a 10-year period (2005-2015) at a single institution were evaluated. The mesenteric defects were routinely closed starting June 2010. In total, 1570 non-closure patients and 2443 patients with stapled closure of the defects were prospectively entered and the results analysed. Closure of the mesenteric defects increased surgical time by 4 min and did not affect the 30-day complication rate. IH incidence was significantly lower (2.5%) in the closure group compared with 11.7% in the non-closure group, at 60 months. The relative risk reduction by closing the mesenteric defects was 4.09-fold (95% CI = 2.97-5.62) as calculated using a survival model. Internal hernia after LRYGB occurs frequently if mesenteric defects are left unclosed. Primary closure with a hernia-stapling device is safe and significantly reduces the risk of internal hernia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#6,285,903
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,216
of 6,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,441
of 454,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#20
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,087 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.