↓ Skip to main content

How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices
Published in
NanoEthics, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11569-017-0282-9
Authors

Arianna Ferrari, Andreas Lösch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 5 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#199
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,841
of 454,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.