↓ Skip to main content

Isolated floccular infarction: impaired vestibular responses to horizontal head impulse

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Isolated floccular infarction: impaired vestibular responses to horizontal head impulse
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-6837-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Kyun Park, Ji-Soo Kim, Michael Strupp, David S. Zee

Abstract

Isolated floccular infarction is extremely rare, and impairments of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) have not been explored in humans with isolated floccular lesions. The purpose of this study was to examine and report selective impairment of VOR in response to high acceleration using head impulse in a patient with isolated floccular infarction. The patient underwent bedside and laboratory evaluation of vestibular function, which included video-oculography, ocular torsion and the subjective visual vertical, cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, bithermal caloric irrigation, rotatory chair test, and the head impulse test (HIT) using search coils. A 70-year-old woman with a unilateral floccular infarction presented with an acute vestibular syndrome with spontaneous nystagmus beating to the lesion side, impaired ipsilesional pursuit, contraversive ocular torsion and tilt of the subjective visual vertical. With rotatory chair testing at low frequencies, horizontal VOR gains were increased. However, VOR gains were decreased with the higher-frequency, higher-speed HIT. While HIT is often normal in patients with central vestibular disorders, decreased HIT responses do not exclude an isolated cerebellar lesion as a cause of the acute vestibular syndrome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 45%
Neuroscience 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,214
of 4,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,194
of 282,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#31
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.