↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of Ethical Challenges within the LowInputBreeds Project

Overview of attention for article published in Food Ethics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Perceptions of Ethical Challenges within the LowInputBreeds Project
Published in
Food Ethics, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41055-017-0010-8
Authors

K. K. Jensen, T. Michalopoulos, F. L. B. Meijboom, M. Gjerris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2017.
All research outputs
#14,211,264
of 23,560,187 outputs
Outputs from Food Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,705
of 457,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,560,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them