↓ Skip to main content

Plant–soil feedbacks and the coexistence of competing plants

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Ecology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Plant–soil feedbacks and the coexistence of competing plants
Published in
Theoretical Ecology, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12080-012-0163-3
Authors

Tomás A. Revilla, G. F. (Ciska) Veen, Maarten B. Eppinga, Franz J. Weissing

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 110 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 27%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 54%
Environmental Science 26 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Ecology
#135
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,353
of 166,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Ecology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.