↓ Skip to main content

Migration and the Multi-Dimensional Well-Being of Elderly Persons in Georgia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Population Ageing, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 174)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Migration and the Multi-Dimensional Well-Being of Elderly Persons in Georgia
Published in
Journal of Population Ageing, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12062-017-9176-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Waidler, Michaella Vanore, Franziska Gassmann, Melissa Siegel

Abstract

High rates of migration coupled with low formal social protection provisions may place many members of the elderly Georgian population in precarious living conditions that promote vulnerability and limit well-being achievement. This potential connection has been poorly explored in past literature, however, suggesting a need to better assess how the migration of an adult child may influence the multidimensional well-being of the elderly in Georgia. Using a novel dataset comprising 2202 elderly individuals across all regions of Georgia (excepting the territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia), this paper proposes a multidimensional well-being index that has been specifically designed to encompass the unique resources and constraints faced by elderly individuals in different age cohorts. Following the construction of a multidimensional well-being index-comprised of domains including physical health and independence, housing well-being, social well-being, and emotional well-being-the outcomes of elderly individuals are compared by age and the presence/absence of adult children due to migration. Findings suggest that the migration status of an elderly person's adult children is related to the attainment of well-being. Elderly individuals with a migrant child are more likely to attain well-being in physical health as well as in the overall multidimensional well-being index.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,119,089
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Ageing
#50
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,622
of 425,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Ageing
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.