↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and application of endogenous phase-dependent promoters in Bacillus subtilis

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Characterization and application of endogenous phase-dependent promoters in Bacillus subtilis
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8142-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sen Yang, Guocheng Du, Jian Chen, Zhen Kang

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis as an important host has been widely used in synthetic biology, metabolic engineering, and production of industrial enzymes. To fully take advantage of this organism, 114 endogenous putative promoters were measured with a green fluorescent protein reporter and four classes of phase-dependent promoters (class I: exponential phase; class II: middle-log and early stationary phases; class III: lag-log and stationary phases; class IV: stationary phase) with different strengths were identified. The transcriptional strengths ranged from 0.03 to 2.03-fold of that of the commonly used strong promoter P43. On this basis, the temperature (for instance P bltD , P ydaD , and P gerBC ) and pH (such as P abrB , P ydjO , and P opuE ) inducible phase-dependent promoters were further identified and characterized. In comparison, P abrB (class I), P spoVG (class II), and P lytR (class III) achieved the highest expression levels of esterase, keratinase, and alkaline polygalacturonate lyase, respectively. The constructed phase-dependent promoter library should have great application potentials for enzyme production, metabolic engineering, and synthetic biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Energy 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,764,167
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,616
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,217
of 435,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#23
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.