↓ Skip to main content

Notes from the Field: Ongoing Cholera Epidemic — Tanzania, 2015–2016

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
23 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Notes from the Field: Ongoing Cholera Epidemic — Tanzania, 2015–2016
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, February 2017
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6606a5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rupa Narra, Justin M. Maeda, Herilinda Temba, Janneth Mghamba, Ali Nyanga, Ashley L. Greiner, Muhammad Bakari, Karlyn D. Beer, Sae-Rom Chae, Kathryn G. Curran, Rachel B. Eidex, James J. Gibson, Thomas Handzel, Stephen J. Kiberiti, Rogath S. Kishimba, Haji Lukupulo, Theophil Malibiche, Khalid Massa, Amani E. Massay, Lindsey S. McCrickard, Geofrey J. Mchau, Vida Mmbaga, Ahmed A. Mohamed, Elibariki R. Mwakapeje, Emmanuel Nestory, Anna E. Newton, Elvis Oyugi, Anu Rajasingham, Michelle E. Roland, Neema Rusibamayila, Senga Sembuche, Loveness J. Urio, Tiffany A. Walker, Alice Wang, Robert E. Quick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,392,769
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#2,007
of 4,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,369
of 322,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#60
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 336.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.