↓ Skip to main content

Aromatic interactions in asymmetric catalysis: control of enantioselectivity in Diels–Alder reactions catalysed by camphor -derived hydrazides

Overview of attention for article published in Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aromatic interactions in asymmetric catalysis: control of enantioselectivity in Diels–Alder reactions catalysed by camphor -derived hydrazides
Published in
Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, January 2013
DOI 10.1039/c3ob40850g
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H. Krenske

Abstract

Density functional theory calculations (M06-2X//B3LYP) have been performed to determine the factors responsible for enantioselectivity in Diels–Alder reactions catalysed by two series of camphor-derived amines. Hydrazides 2 and sulfonylhydrazides 3 catalyze the reaction of cyclopentadiene with cinnamaldehyde to give the same enantiomer of cycloadduct. The calculations reveal that the two classes of catalysts control enantioselectivity by opposite mechanisms. Hydrazides 2 favour addition to the bottom face of a trans iminium cation, while sulfonylhydrazides 3 favour addition to the top face of a cis iminium ion. In the transition state for cycloadditions catalysed by 2, a stabilising CH–π interaction between the diene and a benzyl substituent α to the iminium nitrogen accelerates the reaction and enhances the enantioselectivity. The facial selectivity can be reinforced by appending onto the benzyl side-arm an α-methyl group that sterically hinders addition to the top face.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 71%
Design 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2013.
All research outputs
#17,568,405
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
#4,888
of 6,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,842
of 291,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry
#192
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.